Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Cramer

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1952No. L. A. 21902Published

1Opinion of the Court

39 Cal.2d 321 (1952)

245 P.2d 1059

E.C. HANSEN, Appellant,

v.

CAROLE CRAMER et al., Respondents.

Docket No. L.A. 21902.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

July 16, 1952.

Marshall & Farnham, J.F. Marshall and Theodore G. Lee for Appellant.

Parker, Stanbury, Reese & McGee and John H. Peckman for Respondents.

SPENCE, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit in an action to set aside a conveyance allegedly made to defraud creditors. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, with every legitimate inference drawn in his favor and inconsistencies disregarded (Berger v. Lane, 190…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hansen v. CramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Chalmers v. SheehyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API