Legal Opinion

New Home Sewing Machine Co. v. Bothane

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the ‘opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

In this case the plaintiff, who had sold defendant a sewing-machine for $65, all of which but $10 had been paid, replevied it without demand. The reason given on the trial was a failure to pay part of the price at the time specified. In the court below the jury were instructed that plaintiff could not replevy without a demand, and a verdict was rendered, under the court’s instruction, for $62.70, being the amount paid on the machine, with interest. The testimony showed, without contradiction, that the machine was worth $65, and there was no proof of the value of its use.

As defendant was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Preston v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pettyplace v. Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Perkins v. GrobbenMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People's Furniture & Carpet Co. v. CrosbyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Detroit Lumber Co. v. CleffMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Detroit Trust Co. v. Wormer Machinery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API