Legal Opinion
Elkins v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 28, 2008No. Civil Action No. 04-480 (RMC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Laura Elkins and John Robbins, wife and husband (“Plaintiffs”), filed a motion to compel discovery from the District of Columbia and the Individual Defendants: Denzil Noble, David Maloney, Toni Williams-Cherry, and J. Gregory Love.1 Defendants contend that the requests are overbroad and that certain information is protected by the attorney-client privilege, the deliberative process privilege, and the work product doctrine.
I. FACTS2
Plaintiffs alleged that their Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure was…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re VeigaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Elkins v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MerkinDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Doe v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Elkins v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.