Schwartz v. Slenderella Systems of Calif.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
43 Cal.2d 107 (1954)
HARRY M. SCHWARTZ, Appellant,
v.
SLENDERELLA SYSTEMS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (a Corporation), Respondent.
L. A. No. 22972.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
June 25, 1954.
Samuel Maidman for Appellant.
Newlin, Holley, Tackabury & Johnston and Hudson B. Cox for Respondent.
EDMONDS, J.
Harry M. Schwartz sued Slenderella Systems of California, Inc., to enjoin the assertedly wrongful use of a trade name. His appeal from an adverse judgment presents for decision questions as to the sufficiency of the evidence and the findings to support the judgment.
Some of the facts were presented by…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Aunt Jemima Mills Co. v. Rigney & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Johnston v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- American Automobile Ass'n v. American Automobile Owners Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Mosk v. National Research Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Motors, Inc. v. Times Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Family Record Plan, Inc. v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Ball v. American Trial Lawyers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Hair v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.