Legal Opinion

De La Riva v. Owl Drug Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 1967No. Civ. 31436PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

By his complaint as amended plaintiff sought damages for malicious prosecution of a criminal proceeding charging him and others with violations of section 182, subdivisions 1 and 4 of the Penal Code (conspiracy to steal merchandise from defendants’ warehouse). It was alleged that at the conclusion of the preliminary hearing in December of 1958 he was held to answer for trial in the superior court, and that on February 16 of the following year the proceedings were dismissed “in the interests of justice” on motion of counsel for the People. It was further alleged that such dismissal was a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. ElliotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Greenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Esau Awabdy v. City of Adelanto Scott Burnell Ted Hartz Richard Althouse, Michael Sakamoto, Does I-X, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Wilson v. Parker, Covert & ChidesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Minasian v. SapseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Wynne v. RosenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Cowles v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API