Sam v. Ludtke
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Harris County Court; 'W. E. Monteith, Judge. Action for debt by Peter Ludtke against Mrs. Idah Sam, executrix of the estate of' Joe M. Sam, deceased. Judgment -or plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtPleasants, C. J.
The following sufficient statement of the nature and result of this suit is copied from the brief of plaintiff in error:
This was an action for debt brought by defendant in error December 9, 1916, against Mrs. Idah Sam, executrix of the estate • of Joe M. Sam, deceased, the suit being based upon the following instrument: “November 6, 1899. Received of Peter Ludtke $300.00 for safe-keeping. Joe M. Sam.” Plaintiff alleged that he “left said $300 with Joe M. Sam for safe-keeping, with the understanding that he was to have it any time he asked for it, and with the understanding that Joe M. Sam was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Henry v. Roe & BurnsideTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Tinnen v. MebaneTexas Supreme Court · 1853
- Cook v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Swift v. TrottiTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Pollard v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fulton v. Escanaba Paper Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- State Nat. Bank v. East Coast Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- State Nat. Bank of S.A. v. East Coast Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
- Hidalgo County Bank & Trust Co. v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940