Agricultural Ins. Co. v. &198tna Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by The parties to the action are two groups of fire insurance companies who have been represented in certain instances by common agents known as mixed agencies. The form of the action was injunction to prevent defendants from accomplishing a conspiracy. The nature of the conspiracy was to oust plaintiffs from mixed agencies and monopolize the insurance business of the mixed agencies in the territory in which plaintiffs and defendants operate. The method of carrying out the conspiracy was to coerce mixed agencies to resign representation of plaintiffs and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bruington v. WagonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Bruington v. WagonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- State ex rel. Hopkins v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Farney v. HauserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Mathewson v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Burk v. American District Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945