Taylor v. Ramsay-Gerding Construction Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.
This breach of warranty action requires us to determine when an agent has apparent authority to bind a principal under Oregon law. Apparent authority arises when actions of a principal cause a third party reasonably to believe that an agent has authority to act for the principal on some particular matter. While constructing a hotel, plaintiffs became concerned about the possibility that their new stucco system might rust, and their contractor organized a meeting with the stucco installer and an agent of the stucco manufacturer, among others. At that meeting, the agent made a number of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Woodbury v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
- Badger v. Paulson Investment Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Jones v. NunleyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Jensen v. MedleyOregon Supreme Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Eads v. BormanOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- Bates v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Strawn v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Wieber v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- DCIPA, LLC v. Lucile Slater Packard Children's Hospital at StanfordDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.