Legal Opinion
White Castle v. Planning Bd.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 12, 1990PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
244 N.J. Super. 688 (1990)
583 A.2d 406
WHITE CASTLE SYSTEMS, A FOREIGN CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF CLIFTON, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted September 26, 1990.
Decided December 12, 1990.
Before Judges GAULKIN, HAVEY and SKILLMAN.
John D. Pogorelec, attorney for appellant (John D. Pogorelec on the brief).
Goldman, Carlet, Garrison & Klein, attorneys for respondent (Frank A. Carlet on the brief).
The opinion of the Court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Jersey City Chapter of Property Owner's Protective Ass'n v. City Council of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Burbridge v. Governing BodySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Kohl v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Fair LawnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Dvorkin v. Township of DoverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Coventry Square, Inc. v. Westwood Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Shim v. Washington Township Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- DePetro v. Tp. of Wayne Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Perlmart of Lacey, Inc. v. Lacey Tp. Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Sugarman v. Township of TeaneckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.