Legal Opinion
Sugarman v. Township of Teaneck
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 8, 1994PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
272 N.J. Super. 162 (1994)
639 A.2d 402
JEAL SUGARMAN AND WEST ENGLEWOOD RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK AND TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND CONGREGATION B'NAI YESHURUN, DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 14, 1994.
Decided April 8, 1994.
Before PETRELLA, BAIME and VILLANUEVA, JJ.
Jeal Sugarman, argued the cause pro se. (Mr. Sugarman and Richard Salzman, on the brief).
Richard Salzman argued the cause for appellant, West Englewood Residents Association (Mr. Salzman and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Sica v. Board of Adjustment of Tp. of WallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Aldom v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Fletcher v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Zell v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Richard Grabowsky v. Twp. of Montclair (073142)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Coventry Square, Inc. v. Westwood Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Med. Ctr. v. TP. OF PRINCETON ZONING BD. OF ADJ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Care of Tenafly, Inc. v. Tenafly Zoning Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Mercurio v. DelVecchioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.