Monti Marine Corp. v. Anderson
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.
Defendants apply for an award of damages pursuant to section 894 of the Civil Practice Act after a temporary injunctive order to restrain picketing by them was set aside. On reversal, the Appellate Division stated (10 A D 2d 645): “ Special Term, at the time the order was made, had jurisdiction in the exercise of a sound discretion to grant the temporary injunction * ® * and such discretion was not improperly exercised. Nevertheless, the complaint must be dismissed as the court is now without jurisdiction to act by reason of the amendment of the National Labor Relations Act * * *, which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Compania De Inversiones Internacionales v. Industrial Mortgage Bank of FinlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Mawhinney v. Millbrook Woolen Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Hamilton Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. Greater New York Carpet House, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Compania De Inversiones Internacionales v. Industrial Mortgage Bank of FinlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Dooley v. AntonNew York Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rotodyne, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975