United States v. Kirby
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE
VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge.
On June 10, 2013, a motion was filed by the Defendant, Maurice Louis Kirby (“Mr. Kirby”),- who is pro se, requesting that the court reduce his sentence “as a result of movant’s post rehabilitation [sic] conduct.” (Doc. 546 at 2.) Although the defendant titles his motion a “Motion for Reconsideration: Fair Sentencing Act” and references 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), the Motion is not, in fact, a Motion for Reconsideration. Rather, it is a motion for sentence reduction based on Defendant’s postsentencing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pepper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Hector Ramon Diaz-ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.