Legal Opinion

Katz Drug Co. v. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided May 1, 1933No. 1749PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

Heretofore this matter was before the court on the question of jurisdiction over the defendant. 6 F. Supp. 210. It was then held that under the provisions of section 22, title 15, U. S. Code (15 USCA § 22), relating to commerce and trade, the defendant was subject to service at its place of business in Iowa on the grounds that it was transacting business in this district, although not found therein.

The question now presented is whether a temporary injunction should issue and whether an action by the defendant against the plaintiff in an Iowa court should be enjoined.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Julian v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Phoenix Railway Co. v. GearySupreme Court of the United States · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sprague Electric Co. v. Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
  2. Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API