Phoenix Railway Co. v. Geary
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THP DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. The facts, which involve the constitutionality under the Fourteenth Amendment of certain provisions of . the statute of Arizona creating the Corporation Commission of that State and of an order made by such Commission, are stated in the opinion. The lower court had jurisdiction. The case presented to the lower court made necessary the issuance of an interlocutory injunction.
Read the full summary
APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THP DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. The facts, which involve the constitutionality under the Fourteenth Amendment of certain provisions of . the statute of Arizona creating the Corporation Commission of that State and of an order made by such Commission, are stated in the opinion. The lower court had jurisdiction. The case presented to the lower court made necessary the issuance of an interlocutory injunction. Irreparable damage to the appellant was certain to result because of a denial of its application for an interlocutory injunction. The order…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
In June, 1913, the Corporation Commission of the State of Arizona made an order directing appellant to. double-track its line of street railway on West Washington Street in the City of Phoenix, in that State, between Seventh and Seventeenth Avenues, a distance of ten blocks; the work to be commenced within 30 days from the date of the order and completed on or before September 1. By a subsequent order the time for completion was extended until December 1, 1913. Having unsuccessfully' ápplied to the Commission for a rehearing, appellant filed its present bill of complaint in the United States…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & NavigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Wis. Tel. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.