Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Stevens,
with whom Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Marshall join, dissenting.
Quite properly, the plurality does not question the merits of the preliminary injunction entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois staying proceedings in the Illinois courts. It was predicated on appropriate findings of fact,1 it was entered by a District Judge whose *646understanding of the federal antitrust laws was unique,2 and its entry was affirmed unanimously by the Court of Appeals.
Judge McLaren found substantial evidence that petitioner…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.