Legal Opinion

Kerlin v. Reynolds

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1894No. 17,070Published

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

Hackney, J.

The appellee has presented an extended, earnest and able petition for a rehearing. With one or two exceptions the questions argued are those passed upon in the original opinion. It is insisted that we are in error in holding that the services of a trustee as overseer of' the poor are compensated from the county treasury and not from the township fund. It is claimed that the acts of March, 6, 1889, March Y, 1891, and March 4, 1893, supra, repeal section 32 of the act of March 31, 18Y9 (Acts 18Y9, p. 142), which provided that “The^>er diem of township…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Water Works Co. v. BurkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Hunt v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Spencer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Chamberlain v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Blain v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API