Legal Opinion

New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Borough of Somerville

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 19, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

139 N.J. 582 (1995)

661 A.2d 778

NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

BOROUGH OF SOMERVILLE, DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 4, 1995.

Decided April 19, 1995.

Joseph L. Yannotti, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Michael D. Sullivan argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey State League of Municipalities (Stickel, Koenig & Sullivan, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J.

New Jersey Transit Corporation (Transit) contests the local real…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Guiseppi v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. State v. MaguireSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. Schierstead v. City of BrigantineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API