Legal Opinion

State v. Beamer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 30, 1994No. 244A92PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant’s first assignment of error deals with the court’s charge on acting in concert. The defendant asked the court to charge that in order to convict him of a crime on the theory of acting in concert, the jury must find that he was “acting together with another who does the acts necessary to constitute the crime pursuant to a common plan or purpose to commit the crime.” The court refused to give this charge and instructed the jury as follows:

Now, members of the jury, for a person to be guilty of a crime, it is not necessary that he, himself, do all the acts necessary to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. FarrarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. MosesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. State v. BriceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API