Legal Opinion

McSwain v. Shei

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 25, 1991No. 23354PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

The dispositive issue in this case is whether an employee may maintain a common law action for intentional infliction of emotional distress against her employer. We conclude that when an employee alleges sufficient facts to support a cause of action for an intentional infliction of emotional distress, the action is not barred by the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation laws and therefore affirm.

FACTS

Marie McSwain filed this action against her employer, Shink Shei and Go Sport, Inc. (“Go Sport”) alleging that she had been required to perform exercises which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ford v. HutsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Stewart v. McLellan's Stores Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Dickert v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Carrier v. Westvaco Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
  4. Peay v. U.S. Silica Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Woodard v. Westvaco Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API