Legal Opinion
Moffitt v. . Glass
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 5, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Civil ACTION for damages for the breach .of contract tried before Btarbuch, J., and a jury, at April Term, 1895, of W aictc Superior Court. There was judgment for the defendants and the plaintiff appealed. The facts appear in the opinion of Chief Justice Eaibcloth.
1Opinion of the Court
Faircloth, C. J.:
This is an action for damages for breach of contract in building a house. The complaint alleges:
“2. That in June, 1891, plaintiff and defendants agreed verbally that plaintiff should furnish materials and construct or build a “lodging house” to contain 56 rooms at $7.50 per room on land at or near the Fair Grounds at Raleigh, R. C.
“3. That said materials were furnished and the lodging house built according to said contract by the plaintiff and that the said building or lodging house was received, when completed, by the defendants or their agents.
“5. That on October 1,1891,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Coley v. . DalrympleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Thormer v. LEXINGTON MAIL ORDER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Morrison v. Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Morrison v. . Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906