Legal Opinion

Morrison v. . Mining Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This action was commenced by plaintiff to recover the value of his intestate's service as a care-taker and agent in charge of mining property. The Court submitted the following issues:

1. Was there any contract to pay the plaintiff's intestate, John Seals, for the taxes and his care of the land their value in excess of the value of the rents? Answer: Yes.

2. If there was, how much, if any, are the defendants Ward and Epley indebted to plaintiff? Answer: $600.

No other issues were tendered. By consent of plaintiff the Court reduced the recovery to $250, and rendered judgment against the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stephens v. . HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Bailey v. . RutjesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Blount v. GuthrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Moffitt v. . GlassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Dixon v. . GravelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thormer v. LEXINGTON MAIL ORDER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API