Legal Opinion

Nostrame v. Santiago

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 11, 2013PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoens

This appeal arises from a dispute between two attorneys over their successive representation of a client. Plaintiff Frank J. Nostrame, Esq., alleges that defendant Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman, LLC (Mazie Slater), along with another unidentified person, wrongfully induced his client, defendant Natividad Santiago, to discharge him and to be substituted in his place as her counsel. Plaintiff asserts that defendant Mazie Slater thereby engaged in tortious interference with his contractual relationship with his client, making the law firm liable to him in tort. Plaintiff further argues that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Velantzas v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. Di Cristofaro v. Laurel Grove Memorial ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Shebar v. Sanyo Business Systems Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Avaya Inc. v. Telecom Labs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  3. C.R. Eng. v. Swift Transp. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2019
  4. C.R. England v. Swift TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Kshetrapal v. Dish Network, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API