Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Flinn

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 27, 1996No. 87375PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Presiding Judge.

In this action for enforcement of a restrictive covenant, Appellants seek review of the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees. The appeal is pursuant to the accelerated procedure under Rule 1.203, Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Cases, 12 O.S. Supp.1993, Ch.15, App. 2.

The parties all own tracts in the same subdivision. Appellees initiated this action to enjoin Appellants from maintaining “mobile homes” on Appellants’ tract, and further sought to have the mobile homes declared a nuisance. The covenant in controversy does allow…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lewis v. Sac & Fox Tribe of Oklahoma Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. First State Bank v. Diamond Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Wilcox v. Timberon Protective AssociationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Newman v. WittmerMontana Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. WolfeColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. McBryde v. Arvest BankDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2022
  3. Woods v. Ross Dress For Less, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API