Smith v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants and one Rattley were convicted on counts 9, 10, and 11 of an indictment charging violation of the lottery *218law applicable to the District of Columbia, and on count 12, charging a conspiracy to violate that law.1 Rattley did not appeal. The jury acquitted appellants on the first 8 counts.
The evidence disclosed that in the latter part of December, 1938, and early part of January, 1939, Police Officer Best made “numbers plays” with defendant Rattley in Washington City. Officers Best and Bradley had Rattley under observation for a period of two or three weeks. They saw him at about the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Fall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Roy B. Kelly, Cecil v. Hagen and Milton J. ShuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Charles William Caton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- State v. CairoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1948
- State v. WallaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Franano v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.