Legal Opinion
Copper River & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Reeder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 2, 1914No. 2299PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLVERTON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in error were defendants below. A judgment was rendered against them, and in favor of the defendant in error, from which this writ is prosecuted. The action was for damages on account of personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, occasioned by the breaking down of the roof of the tunnel in which he was at work, thus permitting the timbers and earth and gravel to be precipitated upon him.
The complaint alleges that the defendants were doing business as common carriers; that plaintiff was in their employ at the time, namely, August 7, 1911, and was at work *165…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Winter's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lees v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- State v. Foot YouOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Pomeroy's Lessee v. State Bank of Ind.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Golden North Airways, Inc., a Corporation v. Tanana Publishing Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Spokane & I. E. R. Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
- Novick v. GouldsberryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- McCuing v. BovayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.