Legal Opinion

State v. DALBEC

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 4, 2010No. A09-568PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

On direct appeal from his conviction of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree, appellant argues that his attorney’s failure to “appear” for final argument through the submission of a written summation after a bench trial, as agreed by the parties and approved by the district court, was ineffective assistance of counsel that, under the particular facts of this case, constituted structural error requiring reversal. We agree and are compelled to reverse the conviction and remand the matter for a new trial.

FACTS

We are asked to determine whether defense counsel’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DalbecSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API