Legal Opinion
State v. Dalbec
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 27, 2011No. A09-0568PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Respondent Daniel Brian Dalbec was charged with third-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.344, subd. 1(d) (2010). At Dalbee’s bench trial, counsel for the State and Dal-bec agreed to submit written closing arguments to the trial court. For reasons not explained in the record, defense counsel failed to submit a closing argument. The trial court subsequently found Dalbec guilty of third-degree criminal sexual conduct as charged. On appeal to the court of appeals, Dalbec argued, among other things, that he was entitled to a new trial based on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. KuhlmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Dereje v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Joshua Lee MyhreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. Castillo-AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Ries v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.