Lacy v. Gunn
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant, C. E. Gunn, within sixty days after its rendition, appealed from the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, and he brings up the evidence by bill of exceptions. The complaint is in the ordinary form of an action to quiet title. The answer avers title in the defendant, Gunn. The action was begun in the name of B. T. Lacy, who has since died, and the present respondents have been substituted in his stead.
The evidence shows that both the plaintiffs and the defendant, Gunn, claim through the Amalie Mining Company, and the question which has the better title depends on the validity of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McShane v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Chafee v. Fourth National BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880
- Pekin Mining & Milling Co. v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Littlejohn v. TurnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Granite Gold Mining Co. v. MaginnessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Odell v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Royal Consol. Mining Co. v. Royal Consol. Mines (Cal.) Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Butler v. Dillehay Brick Company's TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Henry Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- In re BradleyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.