Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Westoff

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 21, 2000No. 83,210PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This is a condemnation case involving a partial taking under K.S.A. 26-513(c). The property owners, Howard and Barbara Westoff (the Westoffs), appeal from the district court’s additur of $2,000. The Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) is the condemnor. The jury determined the “after the taking” value of the Westoffs’ property to be outside the range of evidence. To conform the verdict to the evidence, the district court imposed an additur. The Westoffs request a new trial contending that additur is not an appropriate remedy.

Our…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Searcy v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Stewart v. Marland Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Mettee v. Urban Renewal AgencySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Small v. KempSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  5. Mettee v. KempSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Butler County Rural Water District No. 8 v. YatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API