Canto-Deport v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAM BASS, Justice.
A jury convicted appellant of fraudulent removal of a writing and assessed a fine of $200.
We affirm.
In her first point of error, appellant contends the trial court erred in overruling her motion for instructed verdict because the evidence was insufficient to prove the acts alleged in the information. After the trial court overruled her motion for instructed verdict, appellant presented defense evidence, thereby waiving any error on appeal. Kuykendall v. State, 609 S.W.2d 791, 794 (Tex.Crim.App.1981); Martin v. State, 704 S.W.2d 892, 893 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.]…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Flournoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Brandley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Fierro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mowbray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
- Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
- Biagas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Fields v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Valdez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.