Legal Opinion

Canto-Deport v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 26, 1988No. 01-87-00398-CRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM BASS, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant of fraudulent removal of a writing and assessed a fine of $200.

We affirm.

In her first point of error, appellant contends the trial court erred in overruling her motion for instructed verdict because the evidence was insufficient to prove the acts alleged in the information. After the trial court overruled her motion for instructed verdict, appellant presented defense evidence, thereby waiving any error on appeal. Kuykendall v. State, 609 S.W.2d 791, 794 (Tex.Crim.App.1981); Martin v. State, 704 S.W.2d 892, 893 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.]…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Flournoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Brandley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Fierro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mowbray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  2. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
  3. Biagas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  4. Fields v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. Valdez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API