Legal Opinion

Mowbray v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 3, 1990No. 13-88-432-CRPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of murder and assessed a life sentence and a fine of $10,000. It also returned a finding that she used a deadly weapon during the commission of the offense. Appellant challenges her conviction by twenty-six points of error. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

By point one, appellant claims the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment. The State’s theory was that appellant shot her husband while he slept. Appellant argues that the evidence did not exclude the reasonable hypothesis that the deceased shot himself. Appellant recounts…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Rizkallah v. Conner, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  3. Bennett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
  4. Ex Parte MowbrayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Juhasz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API