Burlingham-Meeker Co. v. Thomas
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
Appellant corporation, plaintiff below, appeals from a judgment on a verdict in favor of respondent, 1 defendant in the superior court. Appellant sued on a promissory note and upon an open account. Respondent cross-complained for damages because the dairy feeds sold him by appellant were adulterated.
Appellant sells feed and farm supplies, and the respondent is a dairyman. This appeal concerns solely the respondent’s cross-complaint for damages for adulterated custom-mixed dairy feed. The judgment is for $16,078.25, the amount of the verdict.
Shortly before the trial, in response to discovery…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Kingwell v. HartWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Palin v. General Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
- Walker v. SiegWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Lasting Products Co. v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. SeiblyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Cerjance v. KehresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Amende v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Guyton v. Temple Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1961
- Bellah v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.