Legal Opinion

Swanson v. Bayless

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 1915No. 4840PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Murray County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by Emil Swanson against the Sulphur Electric & Refrigerating Company and another, wherein E. G. Bay-less and others intervened, and V. A. Swanson wás made party defendant by interveners. Judgment for interven-ers against V. A. Swanson and the Sulphur Electric & Refrigerating Company, and V. A. Swanson brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

McKEOWN, C.

The judgment rendered in the trial court on August 15, 1912,- was against the plaintiff, Emil Swanson,-to the. effect that he take nothing, and in favor of the interveners, against one of the defendants, Sulphur Electric & Refrigerating Company, for the sum ■of..$31,327.14. Likewise there was judgment in favor of the interveners, E. G. Bayless, C. J. Webster, T. E. Molaeek, and Mrs. W. B. Womack, against V. A. Swanson, plaintiff in error, for the same amount, and ordering the receiver to pay all funds in his hands to the interveners. Neither; Emil Swanson nor the Sulphur…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ellis v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Martindale v. ShahaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Bray v. BraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Kolp v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Coss v. SterrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Houghton v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Allen v. McLarenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API