Legal Opinion
Grievance Adm'r v. Fieger
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 2003No. 122564, ADB No. 94-186-GAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
670 N.W.2d 563 (2003)
GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, STATE of Michigan, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Geoffrey N. FIEGER, Respondent-Appellee.
Docket No. 122564, ADB No. 94-186-GA.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
October 30, 2003.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the September 30, 2002 decision of the Attorney Discipline Board is considered and, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
2ConcurrenceMichael F. Cavanagh, J.
I concur in the denial of leave to appeal for the reason that deference is owed by this Court to the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Meyer v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Anthony Pellegrino v. Ampco Systems ParkingMichigan Supreme Court · 2009