Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 19, 1994No. 816-93PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MALONEY, Judge.

Appellant was indicted for murder and pled not guilty by reason of insanity. A jury convicted appellant and assessed life imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed. Taylor v. State, 856 S.W.2d 459 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1993). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that an intoxication *155instruction was properly given at the guilt/innocence stage of trial.1

The Court of Appeals’ opinion sets forth in detail the facts leading to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nethery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Cannon v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Taylor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  5. Rider v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Rojas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Sakil v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  3. Bargas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  4. Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Ex parte IngramCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API