Legal Opinion

Gorospe v. Matsui

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1991No. 15007, 15155PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, CJ.

By way of interlocutory appeal, defendant-appellant Megumi Matsui and defendant-appellant Patrick Dutro appeal orders denying summary judgment in separate negligence actions arising from automobile accidents. The legal issue presented in both cases is identical.

I

Both motor vehicle accidents occurred during the minority of the plaintiffs-appellees. Both received no-fault benefits at the time of the accident. Both suits were filed over two years after the accidents and over two years after the last no-fault payments, but within two years of plaintiffs’ attainment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Honolulu Star Bulletin, Ltd. v. BurnsHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Zator Ex Rel. Zator v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re the Tax Appeal of Pacific Marine & Supply Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Boulton v. BoultonHawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Crawford for Crawford v. CrawfordHawaii Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai'i) Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. DannenbergHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Mehau v. ReedHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kaapu v. Aloha Tower Development Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API