Legal Opinion

Bond v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 4, 1935No. 32725PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

Mrs. Elva Nash Bond, as owner, and N. L. Pierce, as lessee, of certain real property, brought thjs action against the defendants, the Texas & Pacific Railway Company and Hessmer Gin Company, Limited, to secure an injunction for the purpose of restraining the railway company from leasing to the Hessmer Gin Company, Limited, a portion of its right of way which runs through the plam tation of Mrs. Bond, and also to enjoin the defendants from constructing and operating a gin thereon for private purposes.

The defenses, as set forth in the defendants’ answers, are as follows:(1)That…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. John T. Moore Planting Co. v. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. Leader Realty Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Sallier v. BartleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  4. City of Sturgeon v. Wabash Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Louisiana Sulphur Mining Co. v. Brimstone R. & Canal Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Noel Estate, Inc. v. Kansas City Southern & Gulf Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  2. Louisiana Power & Light Company v. DileoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Arkansas Improvement Co. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  4. Mitchell v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Sparrow v. Dixie Leaf Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API