Legal Opinion

City of Sturgeon v. Wabash Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1929PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* [EDITORS' NOTE: FOOTNOTE * IS OMITTED FROM THE OFFICIAL COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT, THEREFORE IT IS NOT DISPLAYED IN THE ONLINE VERSION.]

1. — Municipal Corporations. City has no power to declare that to be a nuisance, which is not so at common law or by statute.

2. — Same. Even where city has general power to declare nuisance, it cannot declare place of single individual to be a nuisance in absence of general regulation applicable to all others of the same class.

3. — Municipal Corporations. City by virtue of its police power alone, for purely aesthetic purposes, cannot limit use to which person…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Aufderheide v. Polar Wave Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  3. Wylie v. ElwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. City of St. Louis v. Edward Heitzeberg Packing & Provision Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. Carpenter v. Reliance Realty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. ZykanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  2. Women's Kansas City St. Andrew Soc. v. Kansas City, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Eureka Real Estate & Investment Co. v. Southern Real Estate & Financial Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Sparrow v. Dixie Leaf Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Bond v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API