Earl Parris, Jr. v. 3M Company, et al.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION EARL PARRIS, JR. Individually, and on behalf of a Class of persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 4:21-CV-40-TWT 3M COMPANY, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This is an action under the Clean Water Act. It is before the Court on Defendants 3M Company (“3M”), E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“du Pont”), and the Chemours Company’s (“Chemours”) Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions of Charles Andrews [Doc. 893]. For the reasons stated below, the Defendants’ Motion to Exclude…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Bazemore v. FridaySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rink v. Cheminova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.