Legal Opinion

State v. Futch

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 1993No. CC88-1270; CA A67775Published

1Opinion of the Court

860 P.2d 264 (1993)

123 Or. App. 176

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

Herbert Jackson FUTCH, Appellant.

CC88-1270; CA A67775.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.[*]

Argued and Submitted September 30, 1992.

Resubmitted July 14, 1993.

Decided September 15, 1993.

David K. Allen, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Janet A. Metcalf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Resubmitted In Banc July…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. United States v. Roland Addison, United States of America v. Albert Henry RaymondCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  4. State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API