Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided February 28, 1994No. 91-0990-CV-W-8PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

STEVENS, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion to attend all litigation testing performed by defendant in relation to this cause of action. Plaintiffs request this relief because they fear that General Motors will perform tests and later object to discovery of those tests based on attorney-client privilege or because it is work product. Plaintiffs also claim that attendance at such tests is “necessary to ensure the integrity of the test, its foundation and its results.” They claim that this cannot be accomplished by any means short of attending the tests.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. GayleTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. General Motors Corp. v. Gayle, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  3. Ramos v. Carter Express Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  4. Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. Nebula Glasslam International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
  5. Cheryl A. Abrams and Frank Voznek v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API