Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. Nebula Glasslam International, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBIN S. ROSENBAUM, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant Reichhold, Inc.’s Motion to Permit Privileged Work Product Protected Destructive Testing (“Reichhold’s Motion”). [D.E. 161]. The Court has carefully reviewed Reichhold’s Motion, all responsive and supporting filings thereto, the record in this case, and has heard argument of counsel at a hearing held on March 4, 2008. Additionally, the Court is otherwise fully advised in the premises and, for the reasons articulated below, now denies Reichhold’s Motion.
II. BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Marjorie Louise Dabney v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, and Honeywell, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Nebula Glass International, Inc. v. Reichhold, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Vardon Golf Co. v. BBMG Golf Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Mirchandani v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ramos v. Carter Express Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Dsm Dyneema, LLC v. ThagardNorth Carolina Business Court · 2015
- In Re McNeilus Manufacturing Explosion Coordinated LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018