Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Gayle

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided June 6, 1996No. 14-96-00101-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDELMAN, Justice.

General Motors Corporation (“GM”), seeks a writ of mandamus directing Judge J. Ray Gayle III, to vacate three orders (1) overruling GM’s objection to proceeding to trial on the nonjury docket, (2) denying GM’s motion for continuance, and (3) allowing the plaintiffs and their representatives to attend certain crash tests performed by GM’s expert witnesses. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

Mandamus Standards

Mandamus issues only to correct a clear abuse of discretion when there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex.1992).…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Axelson, Inc. v. McIlhanyTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Halsell v. DehoyosTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Tom L. Scott, Inc. v. McIlhanyTexas Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. White v. Vanderbilt UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. General Motors Corp. v. GayleTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In the Interest of V.R.W.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Castellanos v. Littlejohn, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  5. General Motors Corp. v. GayleTexas Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API