Legal Opinion

Prater v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 11, 1991No. CR 91-115PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

This case determines our standard for the admissibility of novel scientific evidence and the standard for the admissibility of calculations as to probabilities arising from that novel scientific evidence.

The prosecutrix, a seventeen-year-old girl, was raped in a laundromat in southwest Little Rock. She called the police. They quickly responded and began searching the area for the offender. After only a few minutes, the victim spotted the appellant and identified him as the man who had attacked her. He was arrested. She was taken to the University Hospital where her…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. People v. CastroNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Berna v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. BarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. FooteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Brenk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Davasher v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API