Legal Opinion

People v. Barney

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 1992No. Docket Nos. A048789, A050201PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

I. Introduction

These two appeals challenge the admissibility of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis evidence. The primary claim is that DNA analysis is a new scientific technique which does not meet the test of general acceptance prescribed by People v. Kelly (1976) 17 Cal. 3d 24 [130 Cal.Rptr. 144, 549 P.2d 1240] and Frye v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1923) 293 Fed. 1013. We conclude that one element of current DNA analysis—the determination of the statistical significance of a match between a defendant’s DNA and the DNA in bodily material found at the crime scene—does not…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. United States v. Randolph JakobetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. LaniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. People v. GeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API