United States v. Dancy
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
GLADIS, Judge:
The accused contends for the first time on appeal that the court-martial which convicted him lacked jurisdiction because his enlistment was tainted by recruiter misconduct. See United States v. Russo, 1 M.J. 134 (C.M.A.1975). He alleges that he was discharged from the Army prior to completion of basic training by reason of poor attitude in December 1975; that he attempted to enlist in the Marine Corps, but was processed for a waiver of the reenlistment code which rendered him ineligible and rejected in January or February 1976; and that he was advised by the recruiter to return…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. TorresUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. StoneU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. MurawskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. NixUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994