Legal Opinion

United States v. Dancy

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided October 18, 1979No. NCM 79 0149PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GLADIS, Judge:

The accused contends for the first time on appeal that the court-martial which convicted him lacked jurisdiction because his enlistment was tainted by recruiter misconduct. See United States v. Russo, 1 M.J. 134 (C.M.A.1975). He alleges that he was discharged from the Army prior to completion of basic training by reason of poor attitude in December 1975; that he attempted to enlist in the Marine Corps, but was processed for a waiver of the reenlistment code which rendered him ineligible and rejected in January or February 1976; and that he was advised by the recruiter to return…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. TorresUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  3. United States v. StoneU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
  4. United States v. MurawskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. NixUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API