Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Nix

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 20, 1994No. 93-0342; CMR No. 912625Published

1DissentGierke, Judge

I agree with the majority that the military judge erred by not obtaining evidence regarding the alleged disqualification of Captain Finta. I disagree, however, with the majority decision to set aside the findings and sentence. Accordingly, I dissent.

By setting aside the findings and sentence without determining whether Captain Finta was disqualified, we may be giving appellant a windfall in the form of a second chance to litigate the charges and a sentence rehearing at which the maximum imposable punishment will be the sentence previously adjudged. Article 59(a), Uniform Code of Military…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. JeterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. BermanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. ScottU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. ThompsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API