Legal Opinion

Henson v. Tucker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 24, 2006No. A05A1735PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Lynn Henson and other heirs of Clarence Beck, along with the executors of his estate (collectively, the Hensons), filed an action to quiet title to a tract of land, asserting that Lamar Tucker and his wife were claiming an interest in it. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court determined that title had vested in the Tuckers by prescription and acquiescence. The trial court therefore granted the Tuckers’ motion and denied the Hensons’ motion. The Hensons appeal, arguing that the court’s rulings were erroneous. We agree. For reasons that follow, we vacate the trial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Gainesville v. DoddSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. Georgia Power Co. v. IrvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Warwick v. Ocean Pond Fishing ClubSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Anderson v. BarronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Olsen v. NobleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. FOX v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. Richardson v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Harris Ventures, Inc. v. Mallory and Evans, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Lambert v. WahaHawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  5. DAVIS Et Al. v. GANAS Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API