Hawi Mill & Plantation Co. v. Leland
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDINGS on application for Supplementary Writs of Mandate. Writs granted. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This is an application for supplementary writs of mandate to carry into full and further effect the peremptory writs of mandate issued out of this court in the above-entitled proceedings on October 25, 1921.
The facts leading up to the issuance of those writs and the supplementary facts occurring thereafter and upon which the present application is predicated are briefly stated as follows: On April 26, 1921, Geo. A. Moore & Co. started an action against Hidalgo Plantation & Commercial Co., La Zaeulapa Plantation Co., and La Zaculapa Plantation and Harrison Co. for the recovery of an alleged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hagan v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- First Nat'l Bk. of Oswego v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Bates County National Bank v. OwenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Stout v. LaFolletteIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Pipher v. FordyceIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Steele v. Marlborough Hall Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Pacific Southwest Trust & Savings Bank v. TulledoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925