State v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
A jury found Clarence E. Williams guilty of robbery in the first degree, kidnaping in the first degree, and murder in the first degree. The trial judge set aside the verdicts and granted Williams a new trial from which the State appeals.
The identity of the culprit was the primary issue at trial, and concern over possible misidentification was the underlying basis for ordering a new trial. 1 Whether the trial court abused its discretion in overturning the jury verdict is the primary issue on appeal.
At about 3:50 a.m. on September 25, 1978, Alan Johnson and Bradley Farris drove to a 7-11 store…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- United States v. Mark Edwin CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Quigley v. City Court of the City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- People v. GeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- State Of Washington, Res/cross-app. v. Cruz Robert Blackshear, App/cross-res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014